Author Archive

SMS is the Message

Nicole Eisenman, "Breakup," 2011

Nicole Eisenman, “Breakup,” 2011

Initially, I wrote this with no personal introduction, like a critical essay. But, while looking over the blog just now, I realized that didn’t fit the blogpost genre very well. An abrupt leap to analysis suits the message-from-the-ether style of Cellpoems, but personal narrative is one of the basic threads of a blog. So: setting-wise, this emerged from a scene of coldness, of discernment, of craving. Graduate school prospects were waning, my intellectual life was deadened daily at work, the New York winter raged on. One Saturday night, while going out to meet people and monitoring my phone for texts, I was brought from the mere information of my life into an aesthetic sensitivity when I received one of these Cellpoems unexpectedly. It lit something in me. As one does in the winter, I had also been reading Heidegger at this time–specifically, his essay “What Are Poets For?” in Poetry, Language, Thought. This, I thought about the Cellpoem, is what poets are for. What follows is an attempt to process what that this is, synthesizing the technological Cellpoems and the anti-technological thought of Heidegger, in order to convey how these poems arrived to me. (April 11, 2013)

In a peculiar way, art is a pragmatic venture. It must exist on its own, directing symbols and materials inward towards aesthetic experience. It is a building vs. a city. Its scaffolding must finally be removed so that it may be self-standing, to be entered, to be lived in, to deteriorate, or be restored–but to stand, to be made to stand. Unlike a city, which must at once be the compromise of many wills, art eschews practicality, a design that is the accident of many contingent points, for pragmatism, the organization of contingent points into design.

Continue reading »

What Do Bandz Do?

If sexism is a by-product of capitalism’s relentless appetite for profit, then sexism would wither away in the advent of a successful socialist revolution.
–Gayle Rubin, “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex,” 1975

Natalia Fabia, “Brooklyn Rainbows,” 2011

One of the benefits of an apartment party, which one might forget if too habituated to New York City bar culture, is that it provides an intimate view to the things your friends deem “fun.” A passing reference to the song playing at a bar becomes an impassioned sermon on the merits of so-and-so’s new favorite song when plugging an iPod, permissibly or not, into the host’s speaker system.

Such a proselytization was made on me last night, regarding Juicy J’s “Bandz A Make Her Dance.” The song, ostensibly, invokes the typical imagery of a strip club–”bands” referring to stacks of bills as wrapped by a bank or some source more illicit but organized, “her” referring to a dancer for money, obviously, and a hypersexualized one, as suggested by the video. It is, at a literal level, a problematic song. (Are the women depicted as commodities? Is its promotion of a sex economy agreeable? What accounts for the men’s desire to place monetary value between their sexual relations? And so many more…). But, before prescribing a remedy, I am interested in examining the case as it stands as symptomatic of larger social unease.

Continue reading »

Who Answers the Phone And

They were living in America at another time.
They were living in America for the FBI.
They were living in America shit wins.
They were living in America on the border with Canada.

They were living in America further gone into teats.
They were living in America that was the only good one.
They were living in America that was the only good one.
They were living in America who answers the phone and.

They were living in America deliriously.
They were living in America sadly.
They were living in America fictitiously.
They were living in America wedged.

They were living in America Stella by Starlight.
They were living in America the mighty sun.
They were living in America pandemically.
They were living in America across from the Ritz hotel.

They were living in America getting their chops.
They were living in America only for just one summer.
They were living in America beside the lake.
They were living in America for the defeatist troops.

They were living in America for the pleasure of it all.
They were living in America as well as can be expected.
They were living in America as one grows passionately
out of a love affair they were living there every day.

Does this doughnut remind you of a life preserver?
They were living in America to remind you of me.
They were living in America and a storm blew up suddenly.
They were living in America extended terms of credit.

They were living in America but it’s all over.
They were living in America as tissue paper is to a comb.
They were living in America at fives and sixes.
They were living in America the same old same old.
–John Ashbery, “Default Mode,” 2009

Pamela Joseph, “American Nudism,” 2009

Tonight I had the pleasure of attending a reading by John Ashbery at Poets House in Battery Park (Manhattan). I’ll leave all the fanboying to my journal and cocktail conversations, but it suffices to say I was stoked. Ashbery is sometimes blown up into a behemothic, inscrutable figure at a textual level, but on a personal level he is pure delightfulness. Between the poems come asides such as, “This one I wrote after watching a lot of Antiques Roadshow,” or, “This one is composed entirely of movie titles that begin with ‘They.’” It becomes quickly apparent that he wants not to obscure his work at all, but to let it be enjoyed. He is an entertainer, a slapstick poet. After the reading, I waited in line to have a book signed, and when I finally approached the table, my words came gushing out, about how I admired him and hoped to study his work in graduate school and was honored to be in his fleshly presence. He smiled, only a big, toothy smile. I think I’d expected more, a dialogue, some words. But then I thought that maybe smiles, really, are his currency. It’s an incredible trivialization of his work, to be sure, but I thought back to my responses to his poems, and they often have been smiles. A smile, in its way, signifies intellectual pleasure, a knowledge that I am enjoying something. Sometimes Ashbery makes me laugh out loud, but mostly it’s this sort of reaction, an awareness of my mind at play.

This poem, “Default Mode,” from his most recent book, Planisphere, perfectly encapsulates the enjoyment I get from his work. The majority of it is composed of repetition, the dulling hammer of, “They were living in America.” And it is a dulling experience to be living in America, no? But after each instance of the phrase, we get a jarring, asynchronous one that follows. Most plainly make no sense. After the logical rhythm is established, though, the nonsensical second phrase becomes the understood opposite of the first. How could the poem’s “they” survive such a monotonous life in America? Only by living “deliriously,” “sadly,” “fictitiously,” “wedged.” Only by escaping it all through “Stella by Starlight” (the song, presumably), abutted, not in conjunction.

Continue reading »